Rules of engagement: China, Africa and mapping a sustainable, biodiverse future

By Melanie Ryan, Senior Programme Manager, Luc Hoffmann Institute

As a facilitator, one of the first things you do in a workshop is get participants to set the ‘rules of engagement’ for the time they will spend together. How would they like to be treated and how do they commit to treating each other? For people who rarely work together who must agree to ask hard questions and spend long days planning complex projects, a harmonious yet constructive environment is critical. What’s more, with international collaborations, the logistical, time and environmental (carbon) costs of meeting face to face are increasing so maximising the time together is essential.

The ACACIA project, led by the UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) is an interdisciplinary, cross-sectoral collaboration. It aims to link research, capacity building and engagement to enhance planning related to Chinese investment in growth corridors in Tanzania and Kenya. Partners come from the UK, China, and both African countries.  Supporting this endeavour, the Luc Hoffmann Institute team helped design and convene a recent three-day workshop in Nairobi. With the focus on understanding how to catalyse change and steer investment so that growth corridors are more sustainable, ecologically and socially, it was an intense three days.

Despite the demands, the mix of researchers, WWF practitioners, consultants and NGO leaders proved to be a real strength in developing a theory of change that will guide the next stage of the project. Diverse views and perspectives allowed us to redefine the problem and refine the pathways to change.

Back to the rules for the week – collectively the group decided to:

  1. Stay focused.
  2. Find a balance between listening and talking.
  3. Minimise other work during discussion times.
  4. Be thoughtful and critical.
  5. Have fun!
  6. Build the foundations for future teamwork.

These rules make a lot of sense for developing any theory of change, particularly ones related to complex, interdisciplinary problems. Theory of change planning is more than designing a project and activities. It is an opportunity to think through how change happens and ways to define and measure it. The group discussed how to define an outcome, whether it would be ‘good enough’ if they could only get so far in generating change, and how they could harness existing efforts in the region while making useful new contributions.

For theory of change to work we must ask ourselves and each other challenging questions. Are we aiming high enough; are we using resources wisely; do we share a common language, and how is our project different to others? This means we (and our donors) can be more confident in the project design as well as anticipate some of the criticisms that might come from broader stakeholders.

To me, these rules reflect a desire for rigour, solid foundations, determination, mutual respect, openness and, importantly, finding some joy despite the challenges. It’s a lot to ask from three days but I hope the project can draw on these foundations over their four-year journey. Maybe we can all draw on these rules in our own quests towards a sustainable and biodiverse future.

A colleague recently said to me “a tiny nudge can still make a difference. If you nudge a battleship, you send a large thing in motion on a new pathway”. Theory of change is the first step in making sure your nudge is well planned and well intended.

Find out more about the ACACIA project.

Luc Hoffmann InstituteRules of engagement: China, Africa and mapping a sustainable, biodiverse future

Related Posts

What will it take to transform African agricultural policy?

By Melanie Ryan, Senior Programme Manager, Luc Hoffmann Institute Last month, a group of researchers and development experts met in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa to answer a challenging question. What will it take to turn research, money, time and expertise into policy changes that can manage social and environmental trade-offs in African agriculture? Current

Putting the pieces together – holistic knowledge for sustainability

More than 20 years’ experience shows the value of collaboration and the fair distribution of authority in managing interlinked social and ecological systems. Building on this, the scientific community is increasingly turning to ‘knowledge co-production’ – research that engages those responsible for, or who have a stake in a challenge, in generating knowledge to support

Improve conservation impact – understand the local context

Do you work for an environmental or sustainable development organisation and want to assess the value of ecosystem services to help achieve your conservation goals? If the answer is yes, a ‘context diagnostic tool’ described in this new video series is for you. Over the past decade, conservation NGOs and other players have increasingly used