Boundary spanning for sustainability

‘Boundary spanning’ can generate a more effective relationship between science and policy in tackling sustainability challenges. This is the message from experts including the Luc Hoffmann Institute’s Carina Wyborn and Melanie Ryan who share their experience in a paper published in Sustainability Science.

Cultivating more dynamic links between science and policy is essential for responding to complex sustainability challenges. One approach is to ‘span the boundaries’ between science and decision making to create greater, more effective knowledge exchange.

The authors describe boundary spanning as work that enables exchange between the production and use of knowledge to support evidence-informed decision making. Boundary spanners are individuals or organisations that facilitate this process.

There are many activities that contribute to boundary spanning. These include convening dialogues between scientists and decision makers; producing summaries of scientific papers for policymakers; working with ‘knowledge brokers’ to promote understanding of the different perspectives of scientists and decision makers; capacity building to understand policy processes or scientific research; and scanning policy ‘horizons’ to track emerging science needs in decision making.

The authors believe boundary spanning has the potential to increase the efficiency in which useful research is produced, boost capacity to absorb new evidence and perspectives into sustainability decision making, improve the relevance of research and open new policy opportunities.

As an example of boundary spanning, the Luc Hoffmann Institute recently worked with the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) to design a science-policy dialogue on the impact of synthetic biology on conservation. This brought together representatives from NGOs, the private sector and public agencies to develop an easily understandable but technically robust global assessment that will underpin a global policy recommendation for IUCN’s members, both state agencies and NGOs, to vote on in 2020. This topic is both contested and technically complex and the the relationship between science and policy has to be carefully navigated.

The Luc Hoffmann Institute team work with actors and stakeholders on a range of science-policy issues, developing and mapping pathways to achieve policy impact. They are also brokering new relationships around topical challenges to increase awareness, knowledge exchange and develop shared action plans for conservation.

By sharing their experience and examples, the authors hope to encourage a more robust discussion of how to achieve evidence-informed decision making for sustainability.

Read the paper here.

Luc Hoffmann InstituteBoundary spanning for sustainability

Related Posts

A measure to make biodiversity relevant

By Adrian Dellecker, Head of Programme, Luc Hoffmann Institute For years we have been losing the battle for biodiversity. The recent global assessment report by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) gave a sensational and much reported wake-up call, citing one million species at risk of extinction due to human activity.

Biodiversity revisited – biodiversity accelerated

By Jon Hutton, Director, Luc Hoffmann Institute At long last, the environment is finally getting mainstream attention. Everyone is talking about it from CEOs to celebrities, political leaders to the popular media. This is good news but why has it taken so so long? Do we really have to wait for graphic images of the

Disseminating the power of an index that would transform conservation efforts

By Carolina Campos, Luc Hoffmann Institute and UNEP-WCMC research associate; pursuing an MSc in Environmental Economics at London School of Economics With the vision of mobilising us all to revitalise life on earth, I have been working with the Luc Hoffmann Institute – in partnership with UN Environment’s World Conservation Monitoring Centre and global conservation